Thursday, June 6, 2019

Unforgettable: The Engaged Management ReView Writing Workshop




By Philip Cola, PhD, Associate Director, Academic Affairs, DM Programs

On Saturday, May 11, 2019, I participated in the now second annual no-cost (free) workshop to help practitioner-scholars prepare journal articles for submission to the Engaged Management ReView (EMR) journal.  The event host was Temple University this year.  The EMR Journal Editors and the Executive Doctor of Business Administration Council (EDBAC) organizes the workshop.  One year ago, Georgia State University (GSU) hosted the first workshop of this nature, which has resulted in several publications and in-process papers, including one from Dale Hartz, DM 14 and myself.  Dale and I also participate in the Engaged Practitioner Scholars (EPS) Research Fellowship offered to practitioner scholars to continue conducting research at Weatherhead.


This year, in addition to myself, three other CWRU DM/PhD alumni participated in the workshop at Temple.  Bart Morrison, DM 02, Larry Straub, DM 15, and Montressa Washington, PhD 15, all submitted extended abstracts or draft papers to the workshop.  I am collaborating with Larry on this paper, and a series of other papers related to workforce development in unstable economic environments.  We decided that the opportunity to get feedback from seasoned EMR editors in person was too good to pass up.  Larry and Montressa are also EPS Research Fellows at Weatherhead.   Three of 15 EPS fellows attended and we hope to grow that number substantially in the future, as the EMR Journal is a terrific outlet for research fellows to dive back into their research and move something toward publication with a supportive editorial team.  We also hope to continue to grow the number of alumni participating in the future and re-engaging them with their own research agendas.

I was also able to co-chair, with my friend and colleague Louis Grabowski from GSU, one of the three feedback panels with the prospective authors.  Louis is a graduate of the Executive Doctor of Business Program at GSU and now he serves as the Director of that program.  He and I very much enjoyed reading, editing and conversing with the authors in our group.  We told them it was time to “join or re-join the conversation the contemporary conversation about their research”.  This idea resonated well with the group, and although we were critical at times, we tried to provide positive constructive feedback to move their research agendas forward and to submit to EMR after a round of edits following the group’s collective feedback.  Kalle Lyytinen and Lars Mathiassen (GSU) chaired the other two feedback panels and a total of 11 papers were submitted and reviewed.  Participating authors came from Assumption College, Case Western Reserve University, Franklin University, Georgia State University, Harrisburg University, Henley University, Newman University, Penn State University, Shenandoah University, and Temple University.  There was much diversity of topics, approaches and all three EMR genres of writing were included in the proposed submissions (i.e., empirical, essay, and translation).  The wide variety of papers and representation from many organizations made the day very rewarding.

Again, the goal of the workshop is to have executive doctoral students and graduates prepare articles for submission to the EMR Journal.  The journal is a joint venture between EDBAC and Case Western Reserve University aimed at publishing research from the EDBAC community.  Participants learned about the profile of the journal, received guidance for how to develop submission, and gained experience about developing and reviewing articles for the journal, as presented by Kalle and Lars.  Louis presented a session on his personal experience with writing, re-writing and re-writing again one of the first submissions and empirical publications of EMR.

Temple University was a terrific host this year and participants left excited for their next steps with their own research agendas.  Everyone received a good deal of feedback, but more importantly now had an even more concrete plan as to what to do next in the publication process.  One participant wrote to Kalle and Lars, “Your strategic insight and vision didn't just create EMR, but created a foundation for an unforgettable experience for faculty and researchers alike. I am grateful for the opportunity and look forward to seeing many publications from those assembled.” 

I agree completely, and additionally, for me personally it was re-invigorating and refreshing to have so much energy around people’s research interests.  We truly did re-join the conversations that we are all interested in having about our research.  Now it is back to revising my current pending submission to EMR and working on the next one to come later this summer!